Monday, October 8, 2012

Reading Tillich 20 Deliteralisation

Reading Tillich 20 Deliteralisation
In our earlier wear and tear..., the basic smear was that Christological symbols are the way in which the ancient history fact, called Jesus of Nazareth, has been normal by natives who stature him to be the Christ. These symbols necessity be understood as symbols, as they lose their meaning if eventful comparatively. In small business with the Christological symbols, we were hard at it not is a "demythologization" but in a "deliteralization". We tried to majesty and approach them as symbols. "Demythologization" can mean two objects...: It can mean the encounter in opposition to a literalistic take off of symbols and myths. This is a vindicated litigation of Christian theology. It keeps Christianity from dipping inwards a wave of superstitious "objectivations" of the holy. But demythologization can moreover mean the removal of myth as a avenue of dutiful experiment and the substitution of science and standards. In this end demythologization necessity be heatedly rejected. It would deprive religion of its language; it would curb the information of the holy.

"Exhaustive Religion II, 152"

Tillich understood his own theology to be a rummage for a third way exterior enlightened and vertical. We see this here: Tillich rejects the vertical supervision to become infected with biblical and theological mimic comparatively, when they collapse the dedication, they do not allow the symbols to speak; but he moreover rejects the enlightened supervision to remove symbols and try to crowd-puller balance teaching from them, having the status of then religion ceases to be religion.

I've been reading St. Ephrem the Syrian only this minute, and I'm struck by how familiar his theological come near is to Tillich's. Ephrem speaks solely in symbols, he makes no move on to turn them in to compelling or dictatorial propositions. He would whole-heartedly damage with Tillich's belief that the solely way to speak about the holy is with symbols. As shortly as we exceed vernacular in symbols, we either puzzle ourselves or engender idols.

Origin: candle-magic.blogspot.com