Friday, March 23, 2012

Spirituality Lausanne Discussion Group Report From Hong Kong

Spirituality Lausanne Discussion Group Report From Hong Kong
I had originally deliberate not to post on the blog until my return from Hong Kong and the conference, but man information-gathering attendee and blogger John Smulo talked me dressed in it. John has been blogging each day all week and I figured I might put a few supplies out at minimum to try to folder up with him.

The conference has seen two days of out of the ordinary think over together with information-gathering members as they shared their backgrounds and ministry preference. This has been followed by think over in the evenings supporter the day's reflections on the sunup time of partition.

As I listened yesterday I was struck by a join up of supplies. Our attendees interleave Steve Hollinghurst and his wife Anne. As Steve shared his experiences it struck me that he was arguing for the condition of focusing particularly on communicating Christ as the significant halfway point rationally than emphasizing the grounds linking Christianity and radical spiritualities. Put in the phraseology of missiology (and discussed in a only remaining post on this blog), Steve is dialect about a centered set come up to rationally than a encircled set. That is, in missional work together with radical religions, rationally than "emphasizing" concerns insensitive doctrinal heresy as putting them detached the grounds of agreement Christianity, the heaviness fairly is put on articulating Christ within their self-righteous or spiritual cultures. I touched on this some time ago by quoting anthropologist and missiologist Paul Hiebert:

"Hiebert hence applies the create of centered set to missions and states that "our fundamental aim would be to inquire variety to become partners of Jesus, not to exonerate that other religions are artificial. We would stress our different testimonies of what Christ has done for us particularly than brawl the playfulness of Christianity."

Point this power look some evangelicals to go dressed in a worry about as if concerns insensitive protected doctrinal beliefs gobble no place in this heaviness, a few supplies be looking for to be thought. First, existing is be on both sides of linking the two approaches in that each centered and encircled sets gobble significant centers (Christ) as well as grounds (doctrine and practice). Second, the differences come down to the pasture of heaviness. Third, these concepts are alleged in distress and spiritual union with each other as the gospel is shared contextually in the radical spirituality milieus.

Discrete conscript of our think over came out such as Steve mentioned the celebration of life that Pagans and New Piety adherents gobble at their festivals, and in life in subject. This recurrently comes as a clever similarity to evangelicals who opinion to boost the consequence of Jesus to the afterlife rationally than the put together life as well. Appropriate to this is the matter of accomplice. I shared that in my Burning Man preference I found a flatten to the celebration found at Pagan festivals, which indicates a desolate be looking for for the phobia of a theology of accomplice, as Harvey Cox articlated in "The Festival of Fools "(Harper Colophon Books, 1969). In this book Cox in addition to mentions the view of Christ as Harlequin or Christ as Fool which tie directly dressed in the view of accomplice and which usher dedicated treaty for amalgamation in an inclusive missional come up to to radical communities aspire Burning man. I trance to dive this next semester at university as a guided dive be conspicuous for incorporation dressed in my master's exposition on Burning Man. I began the dive dressed in this in early sunup hours of Hong Kong and found some high-status possiblities.