From its images, the book appears to be an anti-Ophite work, primary the neat standstill that the serpent in the Division of Eden was evil, very than the Ophites' standstill that the serpent was a character who tried to teach Adam and Eve in order to let them escape what the Ophites saw as an evil world twisted by a demiurge. According to the upfront church fathers,the work described the appealing manner of the serpent, and its wily use of spells, and thorough speechifying skills, to terra firma favour in the Division and to sequence the original man for its own gain: the serpent was so clever that it typically embarrassed Adam about the inform God gave him, in due course leading to his refugee.
Nonetheless, as this is the feature of folks hostile to the Ophites' views, this details of the text may be very untruthful. For classical, it was excessively thought that the text without delay touches on the wisdom of the Serpent, and warnings he communicated to Adam, and to Eve, about God's clever manner and fixated admonitions on insolence. This attack of view supported that of the Ophites, and contrasts rise with the earlier details that puts the serpent as the villainous joker.
References:
^ For more about Ophite theology, see Ophites. See excessively Ophite Diagrams, Desolate New Tombstone Apocrypha, Non-canonical Pauline Epistles.
This convey is experienced under the GNU Flowing Corridor Source. It uses matter from the Wikipedia convey "Replicate of Spells of Serpents". This bolt may die if edit is absolutely broken up or amalgamated.
